ESG has developed rapidly over the past few years and is now taking a serious hold in Asia. For example, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange’s ruling on “comply or explain” for ESG information comes into force on 1 July 2020 and China is widely expected to introduce mandatory disclosure this year. We have seen asset owners require ESG, the public is increasingly demanding it, and more businesses are incorporating sustainability into their long-term strategies.
The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), which regulates 95% of global securities markets, has “set out the importance for issuers” to disclose ESG information. In Asia, 13 of the 14 main exchanges are now members of the Sustainable Stock Exchange Initiative, which means they commit “to promoting long-term sustainable investment and improved environmental, social and corporate governance disclosure and performance among companies listed on” their exchanges.
Considering ESG issues is important for Asia because they affect risks and opportunities for companies as economies develop. However, there are several reasons why it is not easy to aggregate ESG information in Asia or examine ESG collectively for the region. These include the diversity of the region in terms of economic and social development, the different languages spoken (and hence reporting and disclosure in local languages), as well as a wide range of regulatory and disclosure regimes.
Growth often means a focus on economics and poverty alleviation, sometimes to the detriment of the local environment. And, the rapid development of all things – from financial markets to industries and services – means that some segments of society are left behind or become vulnerable, which highlights the importance of looking at social issues. Corporate governance issues also need to be viewed in a cultural context, for example, government ownership or where some issues have traditionally remained unchallenged in more hierarchical societies.
We do not believe that there is a single uniform approach to sustainability and ESG in Asia – what works in one country may not work in another. Local investors, businesses, and regulators are learning to navigate sustainability issues in this diverse region. At the same time, international investors should appreciate the local context and not expect the same standards to be applied everywhere.
As understanding of various ESG issues can affect and influence perception, reputation, and profitability, there will be risks and opportunities for companies of all sizes. We think it is important to consider the ‘momentum of sustainability’ or the ‘change over time’, especially for local businesses. International companies also have an opportunity to bring their experience to local markets.
For investors, we think it is important to distinguish between information – which helps us understand ESG issues, and data – which we can use to measure things in the context of that information. We advocate the ‘ESG integration’ approach over ‘scoring or rating’ because we think it can offer a deeper analysis and understanding of how ESG issues affect the future course of a company, rather than a picture of where it is now. The relative paucity of ESG information and data in Asia lends itself to integrated analysis and engagement. There has never been a better time to consider the sustainability of businesses – as we launch a series of reports looking at key questions to ask in Asia, the time to integrate is now.First published 1 June 2020.
Would you like to find out more? Click here to read the full report (you must be a subscriber to HSBC Global Research).
Disclosure and disclaimerMore, collapsed
The following analyst(s), economist(s), or strategist(s) who is(are) primarily responsible for this report, including any analyst(s) whose name(s) appear(s) as author of an individual section or sections of the report and any analyst(s) named as the covering analyst(s) of a subsidiary company in a sum-of-the-parts valuation certifies(y) that the opinion(s) on the subject security(ies) or issuer(s), any views or forecasts expressed in the section(s) of which such individual(s) is(are) named as author(s), and any other views or forecasts expressed herein, including any views expressed on the back page of the research report, accurately reflect their personal view(s) and that no part of their compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendation(s) or views contained in this research report: Wai-Shin Chan, CFA,
Equities: Stock ratings and basis for financial analysis
HSBC and its affiliates, including the issuer of this report (“HSBC”) believes an investor’s decision to buy or sell a stock should depend on individual circumstances such as the investor’s existing holdings, risk tolerance and other considerations and that investors utilise various disciplines and investment horizons when making investment decisions. Ratings should not be used or relied on in isolation as investment advice. Different securities firms use a variety of ratings terms as well as different rating systems to describe their recommendations and therefore investors should carefully read the definitions of the ratings used in each research report. Further, investors should carefully read the entire research report and not infer its contents from the rating because research reports contain more complete information concerning the analysts’ views and the basis for the rating.
From 23rd March 2015 HSBC has assigned ratings on the following basis:
The target price is based on the analyst’s assessment of the stock’s actual current value, although we expect it to take six to 12 months for the market price to reflect this. When the target price is more than 20 per cent above the current share price, the stock will be classified as a Buy; when it is between 5 per cent and 20 per cent above the current share price, the stock may be classified as a Buy or a Hold; when it is between 5 per cent below and 5 per cent above the current share price, the stock will be classified as a Hold; when it is between 5 per cent and 20 per cent below the current share price, the stock may be classified as a Hold or a Reduce; and when it is more than 20 per cent below the current share price, the stock will be classified as a Reduce.
Our ratings are re-calibrated against these bands at the time of any ‘material change’ (initiation or resumption of coverage, change in target price or estimates).
Upside/Downside is the percentage difference between the target price and the share price.
Prior to this date, HSBC’s rating structure was applied on the following basis:
For each stock we set a required rate of return calculated from the cost of equity for that stock’s domestic or, as appropriate, regional market established by our strategy team. The target price for a stock represented the value the analyst expected the stock to reach over our performance horizon. The performance horizon was 12 months. For a stock to be classified as Overweight, the potential return, which equals the percentage difference between the current share price and the target price, including the forecast dividend yield when indicated, had to exceed the required return by at least 5 percentage points over the succeeding 12 months (or 10 percentage points for a stock classified as Volatile*). For a stock to be classified as Underweight, the stock was expected to underperform its required return by at least 5 percentage points over the succeeding 12 months (or 10 percentage points for a stock classified as Volatile*). Stocks between these bands were classified as Neutral.
*A stock was classified as volatile if its historical volatility had exceeded 40 per cent, if the stock had been listed for less than 12 months (unless it was in an industry or sector where volatility is low) or if the analyst expected significant volatility. However, stocks which we did not consider volatile may in fact also have behaved in such a way. Historical volatility was defined as the past month’s average of the daily 365-day moving average volatilities. In order to avoid misleadingly frequent changes in rating, however, volatility had to move 2.5 percentage points past the 40 per cent benchmark in either direction for a stock’s status to change.
Rating distribution for long-term investment opportunities
As of 26 May 2020, the distribution of all independent ratings published by HSBC is as follows:
Buy 55 per cent ( 31 per cent of these provided with Investment Banking Services )
Hold 37 per cent ( 31 per cent of these provided with Investment Banking Services )
Sell 8 per cent ( 23 per cent of these provided with Investment Banking Services )
For the purposes of the distribution above the following mapping structure is used during the transition from the previous to current rating models: under our previous model, Overweight = Buy, Neutral = Hold and Underweight = Sell; under our current model Buy = Buy, Hold = Hold and Reduce = Sell. For rating definitions under both models, please see “Stock ratings and basis for financial analysis” above.
For the distribution of non-independent ratings published by HSBC, please see the disclosure page available at http://www.hsbcnet.com/gbm/financial-regulation/investment-recommendations-disclosures.
To view a list of all the independent fundamental ratings disseminated by HSBC during the preceding 12-month period, please use the following links to access the disclosure page:
Clients of Global Research and Global Banking and Markets: www.research.hsbc.com/A/Disclosures
Clients of HSBC Private Banking: www.research.privatebank.hsbc.com/Disclosures
HSBC and its affiliates will from time to time sell to and buy from customers the securities/instruments, both equity and debt (including derivatives) of companies covered in HSBC Research on a principal or agency basis or act as a market maker or liquidity provider in the securities/instruments mentioned in this report.
Analysts, economists, and strategists are paid in part by reference to the profitability of HSBC which includes investment banking, sales & trading, and principal trading revenues.
Whether, or in what time frame, an update of this analysis will be published is not determined in advance.
Non-U.S. analysts may not be associated persons of HSBC Securities (USA) Inc, and therefore may not be subject to FINRA Rule 2241 or FINRA Rule 2242 restrictions on communications with the subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by the analysts.
Economic sanctions imposed by the EU and OFAC prohibit transacting or dealing in new debt or equity of Russian SSI entities.
This report does not constitute advice in relation to any securities issued by Russian SSI entities on or after July 16 2014 and as such, this report should not be construed as an inducement to transact in any sanctioned securities.
For disclosures in respect of any company mentioned in this report, please see the most recently published report on that company available at www.hsbcnet.com/research. HSBC Private Banking clients should contact their Relationship Manager for queries regarding other research reports. In order to find out more about the proprietary models used to produce this report, please contact the authoring analyst.
- This report is dated as at 01 June 2020.
- All market data included in this report are dated as at close 22 May 2020, unless a different date and/or a specific time of day is indicated in the report.
- HSBC has procedures in place to identify and manage any potential conflicts of interest that arise in connection with its Research business. HSBC’s analysts and its other staff who are involved in the preparation and dissemination of Research operate and have a management reporting line independent of HSBC’s Investment Banking business.
- Information Barrier procedures are in place between the Investment Banking, Principal Trading, and Research businesses to ensure that any confidential and/or price sensitive information is handled in an appropriate manner.
- You are not permitted to use, for reference, any data in this document for the purpose of (i) determining the interest payable, or other sums due, under loan agreements or under other financial contracts or instruments, (ii) determining the price at which a financial instrument may be bought or sold or traded or redeemed, or the value of a financial instrument, and/or (iii) measuring the performance o f a financial instrument or of an investment fund.
Production & distribution disclosures